|
The
‘particular’ as dynamic
instructions transmuter The ‘particular’1 represents any universal emergent,1 such as any one of 8 billion humans.3 Every emergent operates
as limited and self-limiting instructions transmutation system.4
It is driven by the need to survive. The active shape5 of the transmuter, i.e., its
identity,6
delivers its output, destination uncertain.7,8,9
The transmutation
procedure10 that generates differential self-emergence is automatic, blind,
recursive11 and quantised.12
|
Commentary 1. For ‘particular’
read: individual, a singularity (or monad or atom), any cognizable quantum
(or unit). Each ‘particular’ is autonomous and blind, though highly complex
ones, such as humans (elsewhere called hadrons) can develop memory and so
learn and thereby generate a relatively (to its needs) accurate analogue
simulation of the relationship to external contacts. Since the next step (or
universe) is unpredictable, the emergence procedure (and which creates
imaginary solutions) needs to be able to organise (or order) the
unpredictable into a relatively predictable supplemental universe. 2. For ‘emergent’
read: an identifiable reality. All such realities are dynamic, meaning the
energy that drives them and their components depletes. They come, like
batteries, in two forms, namely as one-way with long decay (i.e.,
‘half-life’) phase and, in the case of biological units, as rechargeable
systems with a predetermined termination period. The latter recharge
themselves by consuming alternate dynamic units, hence are predators. The top
predator is currently the human. As blind, initially automatic, thereafter
semi-automatic (i.e., with an internal orientations
system) transmutation system the human, like an invasive species, will
eventually encroach every eco-system and consume everything just to stay
alive. 3. In the next 80
years all 8 billion humans will die and be replaced by 10 billion more
humans. The cost to the planet (or spaceship) with its limited resources is
incalculable. In the end, nature will prevail and eliminate the human
species. The payoff for this self-defeating population increase will be
enhanced self-consciousness, not necessarily pleasant. 4. In electronic
communication such input-throughput-output systems were called transistors. 5. Since each
emergent operates as active transmuter, it constantly changes its shape (as
data output), thereby being as it were ‘reborn.’ The overall operation is
automatic blind and internal. In other words, each fundamentally solipsistic
transmuter operates as a law unto itself its survival being determined by the
effectiveness of its output, i.e., its self-selection and deselection by
alternate transmuters (to wit, the ‘fitter’ ones). For an
ancient Indian abstract fantasy of a transmuter see the Shri Yantra. 6. An emergent’s shape (as active data output) happens as
self-upgrading residue (i.e., karmic residue), i.e., the best it could do
within its limitations. The shape (i.e., as supplemental universe) is decided
by the pataphysicist human’s best survival option
fantasy (as imaginary solution). That fantasy is artifice, indeed private
art). 7. A transmuter’s
input is its response (always digital) to random contact (always digital or
quantised) with an unpredictable event/quantum. In other words, a transmuter does
not see (i.e., have
direct contact) but generates/simulates an internal analogue representation
(i.e., a personal fantasy as virtual reality), i.e., a private simulation of
the relationships of its initially digital responses. It transmits its output
as random quantised events-as-momenta. 8. The human
transmuter inputs about 15 million data per second. It generates between 15
and 20 analogue responses per second. All of its
responses are gauged in relation to their capacity to support survival (i.e.,
self-preservation). Those that do are meaningful and applied to reconfigure
the transmuter for enhanced output (and which attracts more useful input.
Those that don’t support survival are classified as absurd and discarded. Whether
an input is absurd or meaningful depends on the state of the transmuter. If
processing essentially ‘absurd’ data (and all data prior to contact is
random, hence absurd) supports survival, such as playing football for the
professional football player, then that data is deemed meaningful. 9. The human
transmuter’s payoff for completing his/her transmutation function is the
analogue sense of ‘I AM (THIS).’ Since ancient times the ‘I AM (THIS)’ sense,
to wit, Sanskrit sat-chit (-ananda) has been called the GOD EXPERIENCE.
That experience is fundamentally nameless, though often named. 10. No matter how
complex. 11. In other words,
one procedure (elsewhere called algorithm or fractal, to wit, a set of
constraints) generates (i.e., emerges) all. The cosmos (and each private
world) consists of billions of trillions of dynamic transmuters, each one
operating as it were as an ever-changing pixel. All pixels (i.e., as
knowledge (i.e., as ‘is this’ quanta)
together produce (for the transmuter) a realistic analogue representation (as
simulation) of the cognizable universe, therefore constitute realistic
consciousness. 12. Hence it can,
depending on input availability and energy, generate any shape self-affecting
as real, just like a Universal Turing Machine. |
